Australian researchers just unveiled the most efficient solar panels ever. How efficient are they, and what is the most efficient source of energy?
Get 15% off http://www.domain.com's s domain names and web hosting when you use coupon code DNEWS at checkout!
In world first -- UNSW researchers convert sunlight to electricity with over 40 percent efficiency
"UNSW Australia's solar researchers have converted over 40% of the sunlight hitting a solar system into electricity, the highest efficiency ever reported."
New world record for solar cell efficiency at 46% French-German cooperation confirms competitive advantages of European photovoltaic industry
"A new world record for the direct conversion of sunlight into electricity has been established."
Australia develops world's most efficient solar panels
"?Australian researchers have developed a new method of using commercial solar panels that converts more electricity from sunlight than ever before."
What is the efficiency of different types of power plants?
"One measure of the efficiency of a power plant that converts a fuel into heat and into electricity is the heat rate."
"Improving efficiency levels increases the amount of energy that can be extracted from a single unit of coal."
The Most Common Electricity Sources in the U.S.
"Though renewable energy is growing fast, the U.S. still gets the vast majority of its power from conventional power plants."
Increasing the Efficiency of Existing Coal-Fired Power Plants
"Coal has long been the major fossil fuel used to produce electricity."
Coal Will Survive as Efficient Power Plants Boost Demand
"President Barack Obama's plan to reduce greenhouse-gas emissions left coal with a future even as the industry accuses him of trying to make the fuel obsolete."
How Do Wind Turbines Work?
"So how do wind turbines make electricity?"
Screwy-looking wind turbine makes little noise and a big claim
"Although it's getting increasingly common to see solar panels on the roofs of homes, household wind turbines are still a fairly rare sight."
Wind Energy More Energy Efficient than Fossil Fuels
"Here's something that may surprise you. Wind energy is more efficient than carbon-based fuels."
Wind Energy's Shadow: Turbines Drag Down Power Potential
"As seemingly limitless as the air that swirls around us, wind has proven to be the world's fastest-growing source of renewable energy."
Advanced Nuclear Power Reactors
"The nuclear power industry has been developing and improving reactor technology for more than five decades and is starting to build the next generation of nuclear power reactors to fill new orders."
"Hydro-electric power, using the potential energy of rivers, now supplies 17.5% of the world's electricity (99% in Norway, 57% in Canada, 55% in Switzerland, 40% in Sweden, 7% in USA)."
"It's a form of energy ... a renewable resource."
DNews is dedicated to satisfying your curiosity and to bringing you mind-bending stories & perspectives you won't find anywhere else! New videos twice daily.
Watch More DNews on TestTube http://testtube.com/dnews
Subscribe now! http://www.youtube.com/subscription_center?add_user=dnewschannel
DNews on Twitter http://twitter.com/dnews
Trace Dominguez on Twitter https://twitter.com/tracedominguez
Tara Long on Twitter https://twitter.com/TaraLongest
DNews on Facebook https://facebook.com/DiscoveryNews
DNews on Google+ http://gplus.to/dnews
Discovery News http://discoverynews.com
Download the TestTube App: http://testu.be/1ndmmMq
One thing I have yet to see addressed in any sort of video like this is the fact that the power grid is under a constant need for energy, solar doesnt produce at night, wind doesnt produce when the wind isnt blowing. And batteries dont hold enough power to power a city.
It like to point out, all this inefficiency in creating and distributing electricity, is also a problem for EV vehicles. Going straight to mechanical energy is much better. I understand that is not what people want to here. But it is very true. It is just a fact going from fuel to steam to electricity to transmission to charge to storage each stage loses efficiency. (not to mention battery get harder to charge with each charge) The slight of hand is to compare only at the end point. As if all these other stages don't exist. As if 100 watts in an EV only took 100 watts of potential energy. The amount of fuel needed to burn to get the exact same mileage out of a fuel combustion engine will also be more. Each EV vehicles has a greater carbon print to make and operate. Calculating what percent of green energy would be needed to offset EV inefficiency of creating and operating would be a more honest figure. Then to say EV are zero emission, which is completely false.
We could have cheap energy already if we wanted to. We just have to get our smartest people together to work on creating a super efficient solar panel.
Also wind turbines are usually turned off/locked and only a couple will be on because apparently there sometimes wont be a high enough demand or any orders for the company to sell the electricity to. Why dont they just turn them all on and store the energy or give it out for free??
I like Nuclear Fushion although it's not there yet to produce as much as nuclear fission plant, it currently produces as much a coal plant, but nuclear energy is best for now. But for cheaper almost reliable sources solar and wind i also like.
Nuclear, Geothermal, Hydroelectric, Solar thermal, and coal are vastly superior to solar and wind. Also, gasification and pyrolysis should be invested in. Manufacturing of solid panels is very harmful. Also, just using heat from the Sun passively can heat water and air in buildings.
Hi, Talking about Efficiency of generating Electricity from different sources of energy sounds great. Unfortunately, it is not that easy. Yes, we know the theoretical amount of energy in a ton of coal, oil or gas. But how do you compare a ton of Sunlight. ? ? . . How do you ship sunlight to a power station, how can you measure the relative energy available. ( Don't get me talking about kW/m² of sunlight energy, I can give you all the information you want on that. ) But it is the cost of collecting that Solar and Wind energy, not efficiency that counts. . . . Now you appear to have forgotten how to get Solar energy at night time. ! . . . Woops.! Now you start to get into Energy Storage. . . Now that is the big question, the big situation that is hampering all forms of variable energy generation. . .. To use Batteries is very, very, very inefficient, expensive and environmentally harmful, particularly the making and disposing of them. . . And how long before they need replacing. ? ? ? . . . . California had a big problem when their Energy Storage batteries required replacing in just two years. . . . . Basically you have vastly over simplified the problem and presented it all in a very, very distorted point of view
Once the testing phase of the first nuclear fusion power plant is finished in southern France it will be the best option by far. But it will require huge investments and it will take a long time until planet earth goes fully into nuclear fusion. For now the best option is CPV or concentrated photovoltaics. Also we need to improve the electricity storage batteries wether they’re made out of lithium or whatever~
The efficiency is not directly relevant for using solar for commercial energy generation, so comparing the efficiency to other types of commercial energy is pointless. No one cares if sunlight is wasted. The only thing that matters for commercial energy, is the price per kilowatt hour. Usually the more efficient it is, the lower the price per KWH as well, but not necessarily, and nothing even related to the cost, was even mentioned in this video. However, this is still an interesting development with solar tech.
Please compare the [costs of (construction + installation + maintenance)] / [hours of operational lifetime], for produce say something like 10TWh of electric energy in 50 years, distributed uniformly and constant in EVERY second of this period .
Then you will see that photo-electric power plants, ARE A FRAUD!!!
Not "clear" green-energy but clearly a..DEEP-RED one!
Watching this shows the need of having nuclear energy. Watch Pandora Promise completely than you decide. Most people will just ignore these facts, but the case against nuclear is not scientific. Its' fearmongering and if your not for nuclear than your for fossil fuels as this documentary shows.
what is the total picture cost? how much energy goes into coal and nuclear plants vs. solar plants? Land costs, costs of materials and energy to make the solution plus the manhours, plus the possible pollution clean up costs for the manufacturring process? I have yet to see any analysis in that fashion.
Uh, I protest efficiency to some degree. If you 100% efficiently capture all of the energy from wind, you get still air which can stratify or stagnate. If you do that with water, you get stagnant water.
Wind turbines are 90% efficient at the mechanical level.
Engines are 50% thermodynamically efficient, but are over 90% mechanically efficient and have to live with 64% thermal efficiency, but they provide us with a great standard of life when the carbon cycle is closed. The product of 50% and 64% is where their 30% efficiency comes from.
Concentrated solar is extremely efficient if we need sub 1000F thermal work done. I honestly see that as a promising technology because we can put them in sunny areas for a net cooling effect. It's more useful than solar panels in some aspects, though I will not deny that solar panels have their own niche.
The sun only shines during the day, and don't put out much juice when snowed on, no matter how efficient the panels are. The best source of power is methane gas (AKA propane, LPG, or natural gas), it is a byproduct of decomposing organic waste and therefore renewable and very inexpensive.
Nuclear Energy - of the future! These MSR power plants could be online in 10 years - maybe less...
Molten Salt Reactor ....
These work when the Sun won't shine. These reactors are safe, zero (or nearly zero) carbon and efficient - unless most everything else.
We should be looking at which source of energy is safest and healthy! Even with 20% efficiency of solar panels we can still provide all energy to the people! For example Nevada and Texas can provide all energy U.S. needs and U.S. have a lot of sunny states! Drinking water is shrinking so in 50 years hydroelectric power plants will be obsolete because water would be very precious! Solar, Wind, geothermal whenever possible should meet our energy needs, Nuclear power is pretty much safe but when something goes wrong like we have seen in Japan and Chernobyl price is very very high not only for environment but health as well but in those places that do not have enough solar, wind or geothermal they will need to use nuclear power instead of coal! In long term nuclear is still healthier and safer than coal plant!
does the 30% efficiency of solar panels and the 30% efficiency of nuclear energy produce equal amounts of energy??? Like do they both produce x amounts of joules or solar produces y amounts and nuclear produces z amounts and the only difference between them is that if the source of energy was wasted or not???
Only true close to green energy out there right now thats the most efficient?...water..and i don't mean hydro-electric either....Ever think about what makes up water?..Hydrogen and Oxygen...to of the cleanest fuels right now....The US Navy uses a system to turn salt-water into Oxygen so subs can stay underwater indefinitely,and the hydrogen is bled off as a waste gas...now think of this ...Building a plant along the coast that does this very same application and using both fuels..to run boilers to create steam to generate electricity...no emissions or heavy metals,no polluting the water,no waste by-products.Only uses a little oil to lubricate the moving parts....Does not require Nuclear anything....and you can also build a plant to create drinking water from the ocean and pipe it to places that don't have much water....Now chew on that for a bit.
Efficiency by itself is a poor comparison of the relative effectiveness of power sources for the electrical grid, since it ignores the important considerations of capacity factor, transmission infrastructure costs and the amount of land needed to supply the energy. Therefore, efficiency alone is a very poor argument for one power source over another, unless it is being used in a remote location apart from the grid. One thing is accurate. Hydro is the best in a lot of ways, but I’m not holding my breath for finding a new Niagara Falls or anyone flooding a huge valley to create a new Boulder dam.
Been hearing about high efficiency solar panels for years but they never seem to make it to market. Kind of reminds me of the 20 years away joke that is fusion reactors lol. Would absolutely love to see this stuff come to fruition but I’m not holding my breath... Someday... Eventually... Maybe....
Comparing efficiency across different energy sources makes no sense. In a coal plant, coal is a major expense and you want to make the optimal use of it. In solar, sunlight is free and the cost is in producing and deploying the panels. Higher efficiency is useful only if the production price is the same, which wasn't discussed at all on this video.
Solar is unreliable,Night,Winter,Clouds,rain,ect...................Its not producing more than it is producing..
Solar has to have a fossil fuels plants running to take up the slack ,if its night or the sun don't shy!!!!
Imagine a hospital or a factory that goes dark when solar stops producing ,several times a week!!
There is a company called Capstone Turbine which produces microtubines in the range of 30 kw to 30 mega watts which have the ability to use a wide array of fossil fuels such as natural gas and its associated flare gas from oil drilling, coal seam gas, kerosene , propane, methane from waste water treatment plants and cow or chicken feces that are put into a digester at farm sites , aviation fuel, recently the company is experimenting with hydrogen fuel in their combustion chambers for electrical generation . Capstone uses an air bearing turbine that obviously doesnt require lubrication so the exhaust is very clean and the heat recovered is effectively used to heat buildings water and air supply and utilised as steam in industrial applications like melting plastics or sterilization or commercial laundries furthermore heat can also be applied in an absorption chiller for cold water for refrigeration or air conditioning of buildings . When these turbines are used in all their heating and cooling capacities for factories, hotels, hospitals, high rises , schools, or apartment buildings...the energy efficiency can reach over 90 percent and meet the strictest standards set by the EPA.
People keep posting about geothermal ... and that's great ... IF YOU LIVE ON A CALDERA. Otherwise, it's just not an option. We need to think about options with a wider application. Wind is VERY expensive and not terribly efficient. Hydro is good, but you have a significant ecological impact. Solar will EVENTUALLY be our go-to option but for now it's just too expensive. People keep saying we need more government regulation to force us into "green energy" ... but they ignore the fact that "green energy" simply isn't ready to handle the load. There's not enough affordable green energy in the world to deal with the current demand. Trying to force us into this will only cause more harm than good.
The fact is that private industry is ALREADY dumping a fortune into green energy research and green energy is getting better every day. When it's ready, it will be more available and more affordable than fossil fuel and at that point everyone is going to voluntarily convert ... not becuase the government is telling them to, but because it won't make sense not to! If green is cheaper, why would they ever NOT use it?!
No one had to force us to give up horses to drive cars. When cars became cheaper, easier, and more available than horses, we all just started using them because that's what made sense. We didn't all give up oil lamps and candles because of a government program. We gave them up because the market made electricity cheaper than oil.
When the market makes solar cheaper than coal, we will all switch to solar ... SO STOP STRESSING OVER IT! It is going to happen. Just not on YOUR time table. It will happen when it happens. Just let it happen and get on with your life already.
This is absolutely right. I study with the USGS and the good news for America is you're situated on top of 2 massive volcanic caldera's on Yellow Stone National Park and Long Valley and even Mexico has one with the Valles Caldera. So why don't those area's have Geothermal Power Plants? Well for starters drilling into a Super Volcanic Magma Chamber could cause the surface to collapse into it an inadvertently cause an eruption admittedly it's highly unlikely but it's a risk that so far they're not willing to take. Also, ALSO... you know one thing Volcano's are really good at firing into the atmosphere? Sulphur Dioxide =D Now admittedly it wouldn't be more devastating to the O-Zone Layer than fossil fuels but they still have an effect.
Me: the most efficient power source is antimatter and matter collision it is 200% efficient.
People: but it is impossible, we don't have any antimatter.
Me: the question was "which power Source is the most efficient" *NOT* "which man made power Source is the most efficient"
Me: And at second place is electron capture energy. And at third place is nuclear fusion energy.
Actor Adam Anouer when electrons fall into the nucleus of an atom, it release huge energy so powerful it over come the gravity of a super massive star blowing the entire star apart in a supernova so powerful that it out shine the rest of the entire galaxy.
That is not a power source and even if it was the biggest power source would be a Super-Massive Black Hole. Can they capture Electron's? Nah, they can do you one better than that they'll even capture mother fucking photon's.
How about calculating efficiency with area to output ratio? I think as we become more populous we consume more surface area on the earth. Reduction in surface area on the earth with the same output of power or greater would really be an accomplishment. We should remember that Solar efficiency is dependent on sky conditions. It covers greater surface area which in turn causes greater destruction to the ecosystem. Why do we think solar power is green when thousands of birds would be killed causing a population of birds to fall which causes a drop in pollination.
I'm all for green energy, but we should remember that surface area is a variable, level of impact on the ecosystem, and then how expensive it is to operate, maintain and effort to advancement.
After all this Atomic Power wins.
Dams effect fresh water circulation, Wind and Solar effects fowl migrations, Wind Solar Biomass need great surface area to accommodate a populous city and or metropolis. Fossil Fuel is pollutant and out dated, Atomic Power wins, The only problem is that all but China are scared of the form and technology involved. before you mention Japan, Japan had an incident because of a private corporation was cutting corners.
GeoThermal deserves a high hand here. But we need more projects to commence and start making a trend in the energy sector.
I have a maste degree in renewable energy, just let me correct you in a small detail, nuclear can have from 95-98% efficiency due to the fact that the are constantly working...also some wind turbine can be up to 50 in best case scenarios but they range from 30-40%!!! Anything else im here for more info!! Best wishes to all!!!
Solar panels 46% efficient .. ...... when the sun shines, in summer time and at a 90 degree angel onto the panels ....... overall efficiency in central Europe for example ..... still ~ 18% at best ....... and remarkably inefficient in winter time when one needs electrical energy the most ......
The most efficient energy source?
That's an easy one:
They can convert any material into pure energy via Hawking radiation. Just reduce one's radius to the desired output rate and you'll have a steady supply of energy for eons. Just flush a few comets and asteroids down the drain from time to time and you'll be peachy. -Gosh, 21st century humans are so ingnorant.-
great how efficient is that 30% in areas where peak sun occurs in a 4 hour period for 120 days a year and what is the cost compared to other methods? Coal is considered dirty but even in the video there was mention of heat capture.
This is the most important example
this is a tank circuit we make volts 12 volts we put into a 200 turn or similar transformer, our comes higher volts, it goes into chokes , chokes are tuned wound to resonance to cell resistance, ( choke can be another transformer with primary as choke and secondary not used and shorted to its self to keep it neutral)
there is also a Diode to stope volts leaving cell a oneway in no way out item,
this means it causes a bounce or ring in in the circuit as voltage is bounced inside and held there we, tune with coil and cell as it is a lc tank circuit ,, ================================================
we have a dielectric layer inside the outer tube the cathode of wet cell, this layer can be just water polarized or a ceramic build up or coating or dielectric varnish or most common is quartz tube for the purpose (like you see in air ionizers) , basically it is a capacitor layer, the voltage builds up there, the water goes between the layer and negative centre tube, so we have a water capacitor wet cell.
=================================================== The Circuit Driver a PWM we have 5 hkz pulse with a overlayed 5 khz gate the gate rests cell briefly , to to avoid the dead short , ================================================ which would ground out capacitance build up and prevent capacitence effect in cell so we can not have salt or electrolyte in this system.
. we have a diode the diode holds the voltage in the wet cell capacitor water voltrolysis cell, during gate period of circuit so no back spike blows up our pwm cicuirt during the gat time . and does not ionize our choke transformer coils, with back spike. ================================================
Having this excellent design causes a ringing or a bounce which keeps voltage we sent in in the cell and cell charged up with volts and with very little current or amp draw, just as a fluro light works, ================================================ Except if we put a capacitor in a fluro light it would build up voltage very very high too and start splitting the gas beyond just emitting light ) this is what we do we let it compound and scale to do just that ) ================================================ ( so as a example lets say we put in 900 to 1500 volts, the gate occurs, the voltage try to leave during gate time . But it can not as no dead short, no salts, no ground and no exit due to diode, or h bridge isolating cell circuit , =================================================== so voltage is bounced back to water cell and hits it again like a rebounded wave , like another pwm in, the voltage has a slight drop
let say cell goes to 1100 volts from the 1500 put in as a example
only so people can visualize , ================================================ the gate than the gate opens from pwm again and it sends in another 990 to 1500 volts pulsed in in 5 khz this creates a step charge the voltage capacitance climbs with each pulse
"THE STAN MEYER STEP CHARGE" ================================================ , This Voltage adds to the first remaining voltage held in the dielectric layer in the west cell that the water is exposed too ,
example 1100 volts + 900-1500 = aprox 2000 to 2500 now in cell , the gate occurs again voltage trys to leave but can't it bounces and reflected back into cell, and we hit it again and again and again, ================================================ what happens is we build up the voltage on the dielectric layer it starts to ionize the water the h20 polarizes and it starts to have very great magnetisium on the dielectric layer and on anode and cathode in the wet cell with no salt no electrolyte . ================================================ , the water splits gases are separated use no current or amps as we use the magnetisium of the voltage build up = VOLTROLYSIS ================================================
electrons flood the cell as the energy bouncing around start knocking them off into water and add these electrons further add to held charge and our pwm & voltage intensifier efforts .
================================================ , , now this is the basics, this is what happens this is why and how voltage gets in there, the more tuned the chokes and pwm are with the tank circuit using ppl the better and faster it does that, ================================================ now it does get such high voltage that the bounce can turn dc (which we have to have) to be ac, we do not want that , so we use a hbridge to switch in a extract circuit during gate this is happening fast , it pulls out extract electrons being freed from broken bonds that would create a ac, so we draw it down, we run it into a 9xd voltage regulator that regulator can run a picsecond driver for vcsell diodes white band cold, which can hit all the nm band of light we can also have uv also well, we want to have a full auro faced back into cell, this will create a light storm these knock more electrons off faster. , ================================================ Now we have very power gas it is a h and o with electrons stripped off it will no reform back to water unless it gets more electrons, so we do not want salt in there no electrolyte, but we also do not want to ground the cell , the cell water or the gas, (THIS IS A COLD PROCESS WATER STAY UNDER 40 C cold to touch ) ( cold water is like a sponge it hold gas) ( we can meter mic fill the water) so as gas or water with dissolved gas in it leaves cell all pipe manifold engine block etc must be positive charged so no negative electrons can ground gas to inert state. ================================================ when the spark finally happens the force is explosive not implosive any more, and thus has greater force than just heat, as the gas struggle to find electrons the rip apart neighboring water and other other gases to get them and often that includes nox and no which is in the water and air ================================================ Now you know this and you understanding clearly what is occurring please teach it . ================================================ Part 2 is the gas processor , as do need to mix some air into the engine we know we absolutely can not use ambient air as that would give electrons back to our new non HHO gas or water fuel mix, , so we must control the ambient air access which means manifold and air intake no leaks, we use a diaphragm to control the ambient airs access so only what engine needs is vacuumed into the gas processor , ================================================ the gas process is the same system as described above except it strips and separates the n and the o into unstable elements that find it hard to reform with missing electrons , we do all of this with the new key skill of making sure nothing can ground back out ingredients, we do everything we can thing off to extract electrons all along the way to the cylinder than means + engine block too. ( not the whole car just the fuel line and engine block) ================================================
So I would Invite you all to copy paste save and share this to as many forums and website and inventive ways as you can, This is the Stan Meyer Culture
FOR THOSE WHO HAVE SKILLS
Explanation For those who want to know
i In chemistry and manufacturing, electrolysis is a technique that uses a direct electric current
(DC) to drive an otherwise non-spontaneous chemical reaction. Electrolysis is commercially important
as a stage in the separation of elements from naturally occurring sources such as ores using an electrolytic cell.
Very Different from Voltrolysis cell Electrolysis uses a variety of salts electrolyte to cause a dielectric breakdown
and high amp draw to disassociate chemical bonds creating a exothermic heat in the process.
by Stanley Meyer In Chemistry and Ionization and Disassociation of Gas is a technique Using no Electrolyte
and uses a a Indirect Voltage Source a Voltage Plasma Field Based on a DC to Cause the Ionic Dissociation
of Chemical Bonds in Liquids and Gas Chemistry. The primary coil is electrically isolated (no electrical connection
between primary and secondary coil) to form Voltage Intensifier Circuit
Voltage amplitude or voltage potential is increased when secondary coil is wrapped with more turns of wire.
Isolated electrical ground (J) prevents electron flow from input circuit ground causing a Charge on Cell Plates
and a Volt Based Plasma Field which acts as a Catalyst to dissociate chemical Bonds. Very Different from Electrolytic
cells and Not Electrolysis as no electrolyte. A Low Amp high Voltage Solution Similar to how a Fluro Light
Works with a choke/ballast restricting amps Having a Cold Process with little of no Exothermic Reaction
heat as no electrolyte no shorting of cell and no grounding the dissolved gases which makse the water a fuel a carrier.?
So Use Volts not amps and BIngo your alot closer
THE WATER FUEL CELL AND THE FIRST AND SECOND LAWS OF THERMODYNAMICS
The Water Fuel Cell technology encounters a credibility gap because it appears to run counter to the long
established laws governing our interpretation of Nature. In fact, the water Fuel Cell is entirely natural.
It merely demonstrates a new and revolutionary way of harnessing what nature has always had on offer.
It does not infringe the two main laws of thermodynamics, i.e.:
THE FIRST LAW: "The total energy of a theromdynamic system remains constant although it may be transformed
from one form to another." In the case of Water Fuel Cell technology, the system is global. The
energy required to drive the engine comes from the zero-point energy contained in the water, a virtually
inexhaustible source. The exhaust from the engine is water vapour which returns to the atmosphere.
THE SECOND LAW: As originally formulated by R. Clausius in 1865, this law states that "The entropy of
the World strives towards a maximum". As recently formulated by Prigogine and Stengers, this law "contains
two fundamental elements: (1) a negative one that expresses the impossibility of certain processes (e.g.
heat flowing from a cold to a hot source) and (2) a positive, constructive one. It is the impossibility of
certain processes that permits us to introduce a function, entropy, which increases uniformly and behaves as
an attractor for isolated systems". It is at maximum when the system is in equilibrium. Non-equilibrium is the
source of order and brings order out of chaos. Since Water Fuel Cell technology postulates non-equilibrium,
it can be said to be supported by the positive element of this Law.?
Gas Processor Purpose remove electrons from ambiant air and hho to stop it forming to water ,
and thus creat a new (not HHo gas) one that is thermal explosive with more force than heat power.
below is a rough guide to doing thay
Daniel Donatelli the circuit stan had on gas processor part sent in micro pulses we can do very fast pulses
on 3 different t circuits to and from gas processor 1st circuit drives in pwm 5 khz up 12 volt pulses
going though a h bridge transformer up to high voltage which includes ballasts/ chokes to restrict amps
like a fluro light start box set , it is gated with a over lay gate 5 khz in the gate off time the electrodes
\ are used to extract electrons from gas it happens in pico second times if possible or fast as circuit can
allow we have a 2nd circuit draw off electrons from the gas that power is used to go into a 9xd or similar
power cap and control 12 volt and adjust abot amps lets say 5 to 10 amp its drives a picosecond driver and
vcsell laser diode array which pulses and shines into the gas processor as well these light pulse help keep
gas energizes and knock arround electrons for extraction it is a storm in the of voltage and light the NM of
electrons is under debate but we know the broad spectrum is Cool White that will hit every spectrums like a aura,
and it you alternated with uv you would hit most of them and get the goals across all of them energy state orbits
it happen instantly, the things is the oxygen electrons are in pairs so that are fairly easy to knock off compared
to other atoms so time to build below is a diagram from stan shown back concept the 9xd and pico laser diode drive
not shown the following 2 circuit are the circuit 1 and circuit 2 alternating
The Hydrogen Industry and on Demand Industry is Global and Using Voltage not amps like a Fluro Light Transformer
and ballast does and no electrolyte use is the way this avoids the amps draw and thus the water releases extra
electrons which are already held there like a battery nothing is consumed or lost as it is a global system just like
charge build up of lightening the energy is not used it is moved causing magnetsium on the plates
and acts as a catalyst
which we avoid and restricts amps , we use only volts from alternator not the amps KEY POINT and thus very different
Please Join these FB Groups We have alot of people building and sharing advanced
Wave power is most often left out of the equation. Ocean waves are continuous 25 hours a day 8 days a week for the entire life of the earth and they also carry 10 times the power of wind. There isn't anything more reliabe or energy efficient.
What is not taken into acount is the energy used in gathering coal and uranium and removing and disposing of waste which isn't needed with solar or wind. When this is acounted then the efficiency is much greater.
DEFINITELY GEO! HAVE to drill baby drill, to thermally superheated water that is! = steam, = turn turbine of generator and voila! and hydro! and reduce population !!!!!!!! WE HAVE TO START, GANG, HOURS RUNNING OUT
You did not mention transmission losses. Also , dams built for hydro power create reservoirs , which in turn release a huge amount of greenhouse gases (methane from rotting vegetation ) in the long run . You could make a video on the pros and cons of Thorium Molten Salt Nuclear reactors .
If stock market fluctuations keep you awake at night, it would be better not to throw yourself into buying stock.
Investing to pay for higher education for your children, to finance a sabbatical or your retirement involve different investment strategies .
To invest in the stock market , it is strongly recommended you have an investment horizon of at least 5 years .
Tools and tips.
2. Define the analysis method.
A variety of analytical tools are available to gain a better grasp of the plethora of economic and stock market information.
The quantitative method analyzes some economic variables to detect trends.
Complementary tools exist as well. Contact your financial institution to find out what tools are available to you.
Tools and tips.
This video introduces the analysis tools and methods you will need to make informed investment decisions.
3. Formulate an investment policy.
This involves setting a direction for your portfolio. The direction is based on 4 principles.
Diversification means a decline by some securities is offset by an increase by others.
Tools and tips.
This video will provide 4 key tips to managing your securities well.
4. Evaluate and monitor your portfolio.
Some events may prompt you to change your portfolio to keep it in line with your investment policy.
Tools and tips.
5. Improve your knowledge.
The investment world is changing constantly, which means you must update your knowledge continually. Rather than being satisfied with what you already know, keep on learning .
Tools and tips.
Investment Portfolio Management.
Investment Portfolio Management is the art of putting together and managing various investments to meet specific goals. We will examine management strategy choices, asset allocation and investing strategies, and management of risk as they pertain to management of an investment portfolio.
Passive management is for investors willing to accept market returns. Using a fixed asset allocation with a portfolio comprised of index funds would be examples of passive management.
Asset Allocation Strategies.
Strategic Asset Allocation.